In a recent episode of his widely followed podcast, conservative commentator Dan Bongino directed sharp criticism at Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), accusing him of playing a central role in what Bongino described as a “Russia collusion hoax.” These remarks came just days before President Donald Trump publicly announced his intention to name Schiff as deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), adding a complex layer of intrigue to the ongoing debates over accountability, government transparency, and the politicization of law enforcement narratives.

Bongino’s diatribe centered on allegations that key government institutions—including the FBI, the Department of Justice (DOJ), congressional officials, and intelligence agencies from allied foreign governments—collaborated to fabricate a story that purportedly harmed international relations with a nuclear-armed adversary. In his view, this alleged narrative was designed not only to undermine President Trump’s policies but also to manipulate electoral politics. What follows is an extensive reexamination of his statements, the historical backdrop behind the claims, and an objective assessment of the broader political implications.

Dan Bongino’s Critique of Senator Adam Schiff
Allegations of a Fabricated Narrative
During the podcast segment, Bongino queried Schiff’s level of concern over what he considered to be a thoroughly debunked narrative. He began by urging listeners to revisit the “Russia collusion hoax,” a term he used to describe the investigation into alleged ties between Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian operatives. Bongino’s opening remarks implicitly suggested that rather than being fearful about the failure of President Trump’s “America First” policies, Schiff and his allies were actually anxious about the potential success of these policies.