{"id":4977,"date":"2024-12-31T05:18:36","date_gmt":"2024-12-31T05:18:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shareinfo24.com\/?p=4977"},"modified":"2024-12-31T05:18:36","modified_gmt":"2024-12-31T05:18:36","slug":"pirro-claims-biden-will-conclude-presidency-by-pardoning-hunter-after-years-of-alleged-deception-about-his-sons-actions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shareinfo24.com\/?p=4977","title":{"rendered":"Pirro Claims Biden Will Conclude Presidency by Pardoning Hunter After Years of Alleged Deception About His Son\u2019s Actions"},"content":{"rendered":"

Fox News\u2019s \u201cThe Five\u201d Discusses Biden\u2019s Controversial Pardon of Hunter Biden<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Tuesday, the co-hosts of Fox News\u2019s\u00a0The Five<\/em>\u00a0dedicated a segment to analyzing President Joe Biden\u2019s decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden. The move has sparked criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, raising questions about its implications and motivations.<\/p>\n

Co-host and former judge Jeanine Pirro argued that the pardon underscores Biden\u2019s long-standing knowledge of his son\u2019s controversial business dealings, which congressional investigators claim involved the president and other family members.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The pardon extends beyond Hunter Biden\u2019s recent convictions for gun and tax charges and spans an 11-year period, covering activities dating back to 2014. At that time, Joe Biden was vice president and tasked with overseeing U.S.-Ukraine relations, while Hunter Biden held a lucrative position with a Ukrainian energy company despite lacking relevant experience.<\/p>\n

Pirro\u2019s Criticism of Biden\u2019s Actions<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Pirro alleged that President Biden has been complicit in covering up his son\u2019s actions, citing his repeated denials of involvement in Hunter\u2019s business affairs.<\/p>\n

\u201cJoe Biden started this presidency by claiming, \u2018I know nothing about my son\u2019s businesses,\u2019\u201d Pirro said. \u201cAnd now he\u2019s ending it by lying again and pardoning his son.\u201d<\/p>\n

She noted that the pardon encompasses the years when David Weiss, the special counsel overseeing the case, allowed statutes of limitations to expire on Hunter\u2019s highest-earning years, further raising suspicions about the handling of the investigation.<\/p>\n

Details of the Pardon<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The pardon covers Hunter Biden\u2019s recent convictions, including lying on a federal form about drug use when purchasing a handgun and failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019.<\/p>\n

Pirro argued that the decision to issue such a broad pardon reflects fear within the Biden administration. \u201cThey\u2019re afraid of the Trump Justice Department being weaponized to pursue charges David Weiss ignored,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Concerns About Justice and Accountability<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Pirro criticized the lack of accountability, emphasizing that Hunter Biden has not served any jail time despite being convicted of two felonies.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf Hunter Biden is being singled out because he\u2019s Joe Biden\u2019s son, as the president claims, then why hasn\u2019t he taken action against Merrick Garland or the Justice Department?\u201d she asked. \u201cJoe Biden claims no one is above the law, but Hunter is a glaring example of someone who has avoided accountability.\u201d<\/p>\n

She added that most pardons are granted after individuals have served their sentences and paid their debts to society, making Hunter\u2019s case an unusual exception.<\/p>\n

Closing Thoughts<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Pirro concluded by highlighting the broader implications of the pardon. \u201cThis isn\u2019t about justice. It\u2019s about protecting Hunter and covering up Joe Biden\u2019s lies. The president is ending his term just as he began it\u2014by deceiving the American people.\u201d<\/p>\n

The controversial pardon has reignited debates over accountability and selective justice, with critics questioning the Biden administration\u2019s commitment to upholding the rule of law.<\/p>\n